SMV in her own Words

I’m fairly new to FDS, so I was wondering how you ladies here would act in my situation. I’m 21 and in one of my classes in university there’s this really hot guy. He’s like 6’5, muscular/fit, tattoos, dresses well, takes care of himself and he’s extremely smart. I noticed his looks from the get go because every girl in the class was basically staring at him, but what I noticed more was his confidence when answering our professor’s questions and his ability to form an opinion which something a lot of young guys lack. He always respectfully shares his opinion and gives others a chance to speak and when our prof asks an obscure question he always knows the right answer. He’s pretty funny too (for a guy anyways, I don’t find men too be funny tbh) and we were in a group project together and we spoke a bit and I really do think he’s a high value male. Even though we’re young its important to me that the guy I’m dating isn’t broke and can take care of me to a degree, and I sense that he has some money (parents probably) because he drives a new mercedes and lives downtown by himself in a condo.

FDS – Female Dating Strategy.  – How to attract a “High Value Male” and retain him.  Basically the REAL Red Pill for women, not that fake bullshit you see Red Pill Pundits push on impressionable girls.   (aka Pick Me’s)

The order she lists is the order of her importance

  1. Facial Attractiveness – really hot guy
  2. Age – He’s in her class so he’s age appropriate
  3. Height – 6’5,
  4. Muscles – muscular/fit,
  5. Committed Physical Alterations – tattoos
  6. Clothing – dresses well
  7. Fitness – he takes care of himself
  8. Intelligence – he’s extremely smart.
  9. Preselection – “every girl in the class was basically staring at him”
  10. Leadership – He always respectfully shares his opinion and gives others a chance to speak
  11. Humor – “He’s pretty funny too (for a guy anyways, I don’t find men too be funny tbh)”
    1. Archie – Amy Schumer, Rebel Wilson, Melissa McCarthy
  12. Money – Even though we’re young its important to me that the guy I’m dating isn’t broke and can take care of me to a degree, and I sense that he has some money (parents probably) because he drives a new mercedes and lives downtown by himself in a condo.
  13. Racial Background – he’s half white and half south asian (I think Indian or bangladesh?) and said how his dad was born in like a hut in the village and came to Canada and has his own business as a developer. And that he’s super proud of how hard his dad has worked to provide. I can’t lie, I’m just a normal white girl and I knew nothing about india or bangladesh
    1. Archie – She’s telling on herself here.  Nobody calls her on it, because women can’t be racist.

How she describes herself

I’m very attractive 5’9, fit/curvy, brunette, I work out a lot.

I would focus on “curvy” as a euphemism, but whatever.

How she describes her attraction game. 

I dress up a lot for that class to get his attn and it works, I see his eyes glued to me and when he speaks to me he’s bumbling a tad sometimes.

Of these factors, the are only a few a man can’t control – Face, Age, Height, And Racial Background.  And the last one was the least important thing in her description of a high value man.

The smart guy would look at this list, and act accordingly.  It’s not coincidental that this college girl in the prime of her life isn’t concerned with his bankroll.  For my younger dudes – remember – YOUR MONEY IS FOR YOU, NOT TO IMPRESS HER.  Older dudes get it.

FDS is probably the one source of unbiased information about actual female dating strategy.

-Archie

Dating Apocalypse Redux

Scorpion called it way back in the day on The Forum. The convergence of broadband, iPhones, social media and online dating have created this creature addicted to likes and hearts.

This convergence was the apocalypse for cold approaches, in two ways. First, the actual cold approach is trying to pull her off of her phone. Second, the phone is actually keeping her out of offline space in the first place. Either she’s so addicted that she doesn’t come out, or she prefers blind dates with handsome strangers and deals with those consequences, rather than rely on her judgment about people in person.

It’s been my experience, and it’s the advice that I always give – when the first meet is the result of a social media DM or a more “formal” Tinder/OkCupid date – the front end of the date is about the guy passing the “crazy homeless guy” test. Do you smell good? Are you observably crazy?

We’ve already seen the whole “Tag the Sponsor” phase of guys with zero game “exposing these hoes” man. (Got to agree with whoever was talking about the latest move to report Cam girls to the IRS as super cringe) But that’s what E-Fame/Instagram brings. Thirsty men with too much money trying to pay chicks to breathe, and the men who can’t get the chicks and can’t afford to pay either.

YaReally already poked the bear when he talked about how guys without the skillset are ill equipped to handle Instagram. How do you deal with your girlfriend getting joy from likes, getting crazy dm’s in her inbox?

If you had a bad chick before the web, believe me, it was bad enough running with her around town. I’ve said this before – she doesn’t have full ownership of her beauty. Men obviously are going to try it, especially drunk ones, but guys that aren’t even real threats, women that hate, women that want to profit, old women, children – if you’re chick is fine enough – she’s getting all of this unnecessary real world attention.

For chicks not so attractive in the real world – online with the proper angles and make up, but also with the connections to high school, college, etc – her objective attractiveness as measured by attention goes way up. In the middle of a relationship, she’s still getting messages from suitors – many of whom are better looking, have better bodies, and have more money.

All of this undermines the security in your relationship in an objective manner. But the real issue here is the subjective manner.

So you come to this realization that Noir put together. You have four types of girls

  • She’s Heavily Engaged in Social Media, creating and consuming
  • She’s Heavily Engaged in Social Media, consuming
  • She’s Not Heavily Engaged in social media, lightly consuming
  • She’s not involved at all.

What is a man supposed to do with this threat?

I can tell you right now, I see women on the train all the time paying more attention to their phones than their children. To be fair, how much you give to your child versus taking care of your own needs has been a constant battle within the gender, one which lots of unscrupulous players have used to their advantage – but this generation of e-zombies is new.

We all know that one of the drivers of a woman’s ego is the need for attention, the right attention.  

So nowadays, Game, good offline interpersonal skills is even more important.  

With the PUA infields on YouTube coming to a close, we’re going back underground.

Pick Up is Going Underground

Download all the pickup videos from Youtube that you can right now.  I use IDM, internet download manager.  Well worth the 25 bucks.

The rumor is that pick up videos, where the guy actually talks to girls in public, are going to be banned by the Youtube Terms of service.

This just happened

The whole community is basically running scared.  Maybe you won’t be able to make money on pick up anymore….Oh No!

Quick Rundown of the State of the Community.

Roosh – He’s converted.  Good luck to him and God, we wish him well.

Roissy – not that he’s all that pick up, been basically deplatformed.

Simple Pick Up – been over.  It’s funny how Kong is talking about how he’s grateful that guys say he saved their lives but doesn’t acknowledge what part of “how to talk to girls on campus” played a part in it.

This classic may be still up.

https://youtu.be/vrqYhFfEStk

James Marshall is done. (The London boys do day game and basically changed the industry)

RSD – with the exception of Jeffy, all of them have gone Self Development and deleted all of their pick up content.

No announcements.  RSD Madison is now Mr. Madison.

Here’s the real kicker – try to sign up for a bootcamp.

https://rsdbootcamp.com/schedule/

Tom Torero – No videos at all

https://www.youtube.com/user/tomtorerotv

The Red Pill on Reddit – Gone.

Who’s left?

Valentino Cohen 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GGC_EfbOjic

James Tusk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rx-828sFROI

(This is actually good series – Indian guy goes from chump to champ and only messes with white girls.  This is the holy grail of the pick up industry.)

Fluid Social 

Tay Social

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7kwARiWjS9I

Todd Valentine

If you’re trying to keep up with Mystery, he rocks with Colgate, but they smartly don’t do any infield footage.

Girls Chase? 

I don’t actually agree with this guy’s advice and this is the only pickup video I can find.  The pick up itself isn’t even on camera and barely on mic.

Only Talking Heads are Left

What you have left are the “talking head” pua/redpill/seduction coaches.

Rollo

Alpha Male Strategies.  

And the Passport Game brothers

1 Master Teacher

AlphaDomX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h4XxmzFmSgI

Before you start tearing your hair out, The Pick Up Community started with guys just exchanging notes on their experiences.  So we’re returning to form.

Pranksters

(I don’t see how he does this without getting model releases.)

So now’s the time to grab an external hard drive and get your stuff downloaded.

-Archie

Most Swiped Instagram Dude?

Fox News is running this story about the most swiped instagram dude.

https://www.foxnews.com/lifestyle/tinders-most-swiped-right-man-how-more-dates

This is his social media.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1kADTTA6Wn/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link

This is his chick.

https://www.instagram.com/p/B1V-veznvMA/?utm_source=ig_web_options_share_sheet

I’m not hating.  She’s really attractive to me.  I might even go a bit more on the exaggerated hour glass, but that wouldn’t be socially acceptable.  Reminds me a bit of Barbie Sins. (don’t google her from work)

Here are his tips.

1. Your first photo must feature a brightly colored background

2. Include at least one sexy holiday photo in your selection of six

3. Make sure you’re doing something different in each of your photos – while looking candid

4. Be active on the app at 2pm on a Sunday

5. Swipe for new matches after 10.30pm on a weeknight

#1 is some smart game, I think that’s something guys should be doing as part of their split testing when it comes to profiles.

#2 is obvious – travel and showing the body you’ve been working on.

#3 gets back to the old concept of “time dilation”.  Take the girl a lot of places in the club, a lot of places during the night, a lot of places during a date, and interact with others – and she feels that she knows you better than she actually does.  Arguably, the trust is building because you’re acting cool and normal with 3rd parties, and it’s not an act that you put on for her. (no, the act is for everybody, lol)

#4 and #5 go into thinking about the woman that you’re trying to get at.  What’s going on in her brain, in her life.  This is how you plan and time your texts.

-Archie

Weaponizing Daddy Issues

I’ll make this a quick hit.

Great little article came across my feed.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/gb/blog/peaceful-parenting/201907/why-hot-relationship-runs-cold

There are a few types of Daddy Issues that we deal with

    • Dad was never “there” (physically, emotionally, whatever is popping this season)
    • Dad was perfect (and you’ll never measure up, loser!)
    • Dad (and the parents) were authoritarians. (A lot of these “red pill” dads are gonna turn little Keisha and Caitlyn into strippers.

But this is about type 1.    And this is why you should do some real screening when you are considering promoting a girl up a level.

…if a person’s father was emotionally unavailable—meaning he constantly fluctuated between dismissive and rejecting to idealizing and controlling—the person may be drawn to a partner who operates similarly. The unconscious promise of remastering a painful childhood dynamic is exhilarating and intoxicating. Winning the love of a partner who unconsciously reminds a person of a rejecting parent offers a chance to eradicate the original pain.

You can tell this is written by a woman and for a female audience with this line.  There’s some hedging on the he or she stuff, but this narrative, this lie people tell themselves is rarely directed at men.  Those men that do fall victim to these chicks (who among us have not?), are ridiculed.

It’s written to be gender neutral – but even a blind man can see it.

The author goes into some tight game here though.

The hook is that many emotionally unavailable people launch a relationship by wooing their partner. By idealizing and showering a partner with the affirmation and validation the partner is hungry for, the emotionally unavailable person easily reels a partner in.

Affirmation and validation the partner is hungry for.

This is the old chest nut.

Tell a pretty girl she’s smart

Tell a smart girl she’s pretty

She goes on to write

Yet once the emotionally unavailable party has the partner invested in the relationship, he or she changes the game. Suddenly he or she becomes dismissive and critical.

This throws the partner into a panic because the love he or she longs for is yanked away, which reawakens the trauma that an emotionally abusive parent inflicted. Instead of recognizing the reality of the emotionally abusive relationship, the partner experiences searing emotional pain.

I want to focus on the part right here – “instead of recognizing the reality”.

I understand what that means intellectually, but who can honestly do that in the moment.  This bit of therapy is a bit of victim blaming if you ask me.

But I’ve said before, if you were to give the average attractive woman the sociopath test – she’d “pass” with flying colors.

Let’s read how this woman describes an emotionally unavailable partner.

    1. They swing from loving you to treating you with disdain.
    2. They believe they are right and have difficulties entertaining a partner’s perspective if it differs from their own.
    3. It is their way or the highway.
    4. It is almost impossible to resolve conflict, and simple disagreements explode into nightmarish fights.
    5. They play the victim in order to garner sympathy and avoid taking responsibility for their actions.
    6. They display sympathy but lack empathy.
    7. They induce shame in a partner.

Hmm, who does this sound like?

Protect yourself my brothers.

-Archie

 

 

Technical Game Bible Review Pt 3 of 3

So we come to the end.  I really don’t fee like I’ve given this book enough analysis to be honest.

Saul wraps up the book with 2 chapters.  How to Run Your Nights and Advanced Content of How to Deal with very Socially Savvy Girls.

How To Run Your Nights Out

This chapter is broken up into 10 sections – but the first section is Strategy vs Tactics. (I cover this in my rough draft actually).

Strategy is seen as the overarching game plan to achieving your long-term goals. It is the pathway or bridge to your goals. While tactics are the more concrete, smaller steps that allow you to actually cross that bridge

I would have put this way earlier in the book, but that’s a personal preference.

He breaks down what I call the “timeline of the night”.  How much time to spend in the early stages, when to do your approaches, when to develop your new connections, and when to leave the venue with your new friend.

He gets into screening here, which again is something I’d put earlier.

His 3 screens are Availability (single or taken), Logistics (Covered earlier), and Sexual Openness (aka the DTF a random but charming stranger).

Let’s talk availability.

From my experience, a girl that’s in love with her fiance will sneak off with the guy that rings her bell.

When you read the posts of beginners

    • Initial Offline Cold Approach – Guys often try to establish if the girl has a boyfriend right off the bat.  This gives the girl an easy out if his approach was not good. In fact, girls say this even after a good step up, but a failure on the opener. It’s a get out of an awkward (and potentially dangerous) situation.
    • IHAB shows up after she’s attracted, after she’s aroused, after the hook up – and all of those situations have different meaning given the social context.
    • Social circle situation – Guys are often confused by girls with boyfriends that give them attention.
    • Online, a lot of these Sherlock Homies will do a reverse image search, find the girl’s instagram/facebook/seeking arrangement profile and now are freaking about it (Both Square/Blue Pill guys and Red Pill guys that should know fucking better)

I’m guessing Saul is not trying to lose market share with guys that haven’t fully realized how sexual (and sex crazed) the average woman is.  He’s still honoring the socially programmed code of honor, where you don’t mess with another man’s woman.

What The Game teaches us, is respect for a woman’s choices and her nature.  She’s her own person.  She isn’t controlled by any man, not me, not you.  And to gape into the abyss of female choice and sexuality is akin to experiencing a Lovecraftian cosmic horror.

Openness to Hooking Up

The central tenet of game is that people will follow who has the strongest reality.  The better your game is, the more you operate on frames, on what the meaning of reality is.

How is a piece of paper that measures 2.61 inches wide and 6.14 inches long so powerful?

We’ve accepted the reality of it.  Money is one of the biggest cons there is.

And so is power.

So the belief system the girl comes into the initial meeting with, isn’t the one she has to keep.

“I met someone that makes me look at life differently”

That might be too advanced a concept for a beginner’s book.  But I’m betting that he uses this concept, even is he isn’t aware of it.

That said, his screening for DTF is top notch. And from a different perspective, a man can use the DTF screening as a tool to arouse, change the direction of a conversation, pull lots of details.

He even has a cool little 3rd party trick to “stealth” gauge the chick’s receptiveness on page 201. (Gotta buy the book homie)

From there, Saul gets into the mental process the player goes through as he’s making connections with girls of interest.  Committing to a course of action, staying in set, re-approaching when necessary.

Fastest Way to Get Good

Is a painfully short section.  I’ll leave it at that.

Advanced Content – Frame Battles

Frame Battles: Within any given social space, two conflicting realities cannot co-exist. The stronger reality always wins out.

I mentioned this in my review above, but the essence of Game with a capital G, what turns regular Christians into Creflo Dollar.

He believes so much in the Lord, in himself, that it affects his followers.

So Saul gets into this in a very limited fashion when he gives the play by play for a Club Queen.

The Club Queen – Young, Hot, Socially Savvy, doesn’t care much how you look or how much you make.  She can get what she wants, be it a height, muscles, pretty face, money, whatever.  She’s entitled.  She knows it.

There may be prettier girls out there, but she’s the one your after.  She knows it.  You know it.  And all the cards are in her favor…or are they?

What is she after?  Saul explains, Status.  He goes into her psychology and then gives you insight of both of WHAT NOT TO DO and WHAT TO DO.
Then he caps it off with a great example.  If you have never dealt with these chicks, it reads like fiction.  If you have dealt with these chicks, you want to put your hands through the book and slap the girl on the ass.

Like I’ve said before, the female giraffe kicks the male giraffe in the chest when it’s time to produce the next generation of long neck horses.  Women that antagonize suitors are playing their part in the Grand Game as designed by the creator.

Overall 

This is a solid piece of work.  I don’t agree with everything, as to be expected.  Most men don’t agree on everything.  But a lot of the core stuff I advocate and use in my own life, he does as well.

You’ll find that successful guys often converge on the same ideas INDEPENDENTLY.  Which is why it’s important for players to keep up on what’s going on in the scene.

I’m not getting paid for this, but I’ll send some of my few visitors his way.

http://www.technicalgamebible.com/

Technical Game Bible Review Pt 2 of 3

First day off in ~2 months.  I need to figure out this 4 hour work week thing.

There’s a Ghostface Killa reference here for my Hip Hop Heads

The Tail End of The Emotional Arousal Section

So we left off on Prizing Frames.

A ‘Prizing Frame’ is simply an expression which allows you to very directly and straightforwardly communicate that you are the ‘prize’ and flip the script. Broadly speaking, the idea is to  re-frame something she says to imply that she is trying to pick you up and sleep with you. Think of it as putting your own dick on a pedestal. The polar opposite of what every guy does by putting the girl on a pedestal.

Saul really knows his old school game.

This sort of “micro” game, where you look at the interaction from word to word, from glance to glance, from social scenario to the next… you’ll start to see how a lot of the game is really in what is NOT SAID.

The communication of the Prizing Frame is more than just about flipping the interaction – it’s about looking at a simple conversation between you and a girl, and not thinking that all you can do is say stuff to impress her, to make her like you.

It opens up the idea that every word, every look, every part of the interaction has MEANING.  And if you start to think more about the interaction at a higher level, you have more possibilities.

Saul doesn’t go this far, given that it’s a book for beginners. But if you’re reading my blog, you’re far from a beginner.

What’s really good about this book, is that Saul lays out some examples of how to use this in conversation.  He not only gives the words themselves, but a lot of the non-verbal aspects to the framing and delivery.

From this point in the book, he really gets more into the technical things we did in the old school to get the girl going emotionally.

    • Takeaways
    • Challenges
    • Expression of Boundaries
    • Self Amusement
    • Role-Plays
    • Sexual Misinterpretations
    • Games and Gimmicks
    • Cold Reads
    • Deep Personality Compliments
    • Demonstration of Intellectual Value

All have clear explanations and examples.

I can’t contain my excitement and admiration for compiling technical ideas that anyone can just pick up, understand, and use.

Emotional Leading

The next Big Section of the Book is Emotional Leading.  It’s the last 3rd of the book, but probably the most important.

Most Red Pill guys talking about pick up operate on this basic model.

  1. Show enough sexual market value
  2. She hooks up with you

Yeah brah, just up your reps, maybe do a cycle or two, and just show up. The girls do all the work

If you come from an old school Pick Up, you realize that being a good looking guy, muscles, and some money in the bank is NEVER enough. Girls rarely move first. The ones that do are often the ones that don’t have anything to lose if they see you reject them.  You think rejection is painful for a guy, it’s devastating for a girl.

The girl might be attracted, she might even be aroused, but she’s not going to grab you by the collar and toss you on the bed at Ikea and have her way with you.

Most vanilla porn is about the girl either being the aggressor, or making it real easy for the guy to make a move.  The other side is that the guy engages in some sort of power scenario.

In both cases, it’s fantasy. Hooking up with the girl for the first time is an exercise in pursuit.  We don’t get to change the rules of the animal kingdom.

So it’s obvious that you need to lead her, like a Cowboy.

https://youtu.be/z__AMV80IHo?t=60

But you’re not pulling on reins, (unless you’re into that.  Pony Play is all the rage these days).

You want her to go somewhere, but you don’t want to pull her/push her.  You want her to chase you there.

How? Elicit Investment.

His understanding of the game and how most guys think when they read those words is impeccable. Cause guys see one thing, and then do what’s natural to them based on a natural understanding of language.  Pick Up has a lot of everyday words with nuanced and technical meanings.

In the literature, eliciting investment is hand in hand with “hoop theory”.  Make the girl jump through hoops, and she’ll jump into bed with you.

Guys just take the bare idea and run with it.  Saul makes a crucial distinction between a Social Value Hoop and an Emotional Investment Hoop.   What the guy wants is emotional investment, not for her to gain/lose social value.  It’s a subtle point, but what it does for the reader is makes him reevaluate what he’s trying to get girls to do.  Morever, Saul connects the girl’s actions to end goal.

From there, he breaks down the 3 levels of investment hoops.  Explicitly breaking it down to different levels is new territory in pickup.  We’ve always known, he’s just specified it.

From there, he goes into using sexual arousal to get more investment.  It’s an interesting discussion, almost academic. In isolation, it’s offputting.  But if you’ve gotten this far in the book, it’s riveting.

There’s a discussion of positive and negative rewards in this context.  And then he gives examples of the whole thing.

He mentions something I tend to harp on, the tendency for women to offer up significant life details in the most nonchalant way.  Most guys react to stuff like a pet dying, but Saul says that context really rules the meaning of the words, not the words themselves.  That’s a key insight.

On 9’s and 10’s

A legitimate stunner is NOT the same as a normal girl.

I don’t disagree on the merits, but I have different view of the 9/10 problem.

Starting with what I would call an objective 10 – any chick that’s become a super model.

Martha Hunt, Karen Elson, Alek Wek (examples)- to me, these women have their moments, but they aren’t my personal 10’s.

My 10s look more like this

The Models are still objective 10’s.

Supermodels are still treated like God’s Gift to Mankind by the public in general.  The really good ones have the social savvy to leverage that into wealth, fame, and power.   They become physically sheltered.  The average random guy does not just bump into Candice Swanepoel.

These girls are physically and socially isolated.  The only kind of guys they mess with – guys before the fame, and guys of the same status and in the same social class.

So the objective 10 is one that “everyone” has decided is attractive, they treat her accordingly, she acknowledges her status, and uses it.

What guys run into on a regular basis

  • Girls with Beautiful faces that aren’t difficult. They’re not approachable by newbs, because the newb writes a story in his mind about who she is.  He “sikes” himself out. (psychs looks weird)
  • Girls with great bodies, decent faces, but tend to deal with a lot of thirsty “alpha” dudes. (Video Vixens)
  • Girls with Beautiful faces that are not society’s preferred brand. For the most part, the super model is Nordic/Slavic, melanated version of such, or she’s exotic/visually striking.

Models that are striking but not conventionally pretty 

 

  • Girls that have neither body nor face, but have the expectations of queens.

So to me, this particular section is a little weak, because Saul isn’t really breaking down the her mentality, the social aspects, and the guy’s mentality about so-called 10’s.

If you’re on the East Coast, black dudes love Latinas.  Dominicans, Cubans, Brazilians, Colombians.  The Latinas that migrate to the states go from 6’s at home to 9’s based on THIRST.  So they develop INTO girls with the expectations of these savvy super model.  Lame dudes gas these girls up so much that a real player has to figure out a way to get at these girls.

But as we have discovered, rather than pay an exorbitant price here, just fly to “the factory” and get them for rock bottom prices.  Colombians in Miami are at a social premium, but in Medellin it’s just Tuesday.

What I mean to say that a girl’s objective looks don’t ever determine her outlook, her personality, her behavior, how she treats others, how society treats her, and what you need to do to make the connection.

Most PUA’s don’t think that. They do think that a girl with an Angel Face is automatically one way or another.

You can’t look at a girl’s face and know that she’s socially savvy and has good girl game.  That’s only uncovered via interaction.

To his credit, he does get into how much a guy has to push the girl that thinks of herself as a supermodel and expects to be treated like Kim/Nicki.

In my experience, you don’t come in heavy like this until it’s warranted.  I’m pretty sure that’s how Mystery deploys negs.  If she’s a bitchy LA Club princess – adjust game accordingly.

And it’s helpful to think that it’s not really a battle, it’s the girl saying that she wants to play.  She just plays rough.

What should have been the best chapter imo, is marred by this oversight.

Physical Expressions

This is a useful chapter.  He distinguishes between physicality and escalation.

Escalation is going from very neutral physical touches to ones that are more familiar, more romantic, and more sexual.

What if you touched a girl with a different intent?

Let’s say you and your girl are out at a restaurant. She goes to the lady’s room. When she comes back, she traces her hand along your back to let you know she’s returned.

It’s not a sexual touch, and it’s not level 10 in terms of pleasurable.  But it is calming and soothing.

So Saul goes into how to use touch in the context of the initial pick up.  Some touches are soothing and provide comfort. Some provide tension.  Some are about positive reinforcement.  It’s very useful stuff.  A perfect version of this book would have candid photos of people doing said moves.

There’s a mini-section on whether you should go for a makeout on the road to pulling her home.  I’m pretty much against releasing sexual tension when i can’t close.  I prefer my game to be really tight.  That said, I’ve done it in the past, as many others have, and still gotten to end.

Leading Her Around the Venue is touched on.  He distinguishes from the old school bouncing and the new RSD babystepping idea of getting her out of the club.  He does go into the old school philosophy of why bouncing helps with the interaction.

Sexual Expressions and the end game

Not gonna get too deep into this one.  It’s a family blog!

He does go into how to avoid the friendzone here.  I’d put something like this in the first chapter.

Calibration is discussed.  Again, something i’d mention earlier.

From there, he gets into the light sexual/romantic verbals to heavier ones.

The actual process of leaving the venue is explained, and he goes into pitfalls.

He talks about screening for logistics here, and this is where we diverge.  Always establish logistics way before you get to the heavy attraction stuff.  Though it is possible to get a girl to move heaven and earth once she’s sufficiently in to you – MOST OF THE TIME, she’s not going to do any of the work.

“Seeding the Pull” and “Pulling the Trigger Follow”.

Handling objections is barely discussed, and this section should be much beefier.  I don’t run into objections as much any more, because i’m screening out bad logistics, handling her friends, and trying to pull the girl deeper into – “I really like this guy” versus “I really want to hook up, and this guy will do”.

Cialdini’s principles are adapted to pulling as well as common sales tactics are fleshed out a bit for the pick up context.  Not really my taste, but it’s traditional to use this sort of stuff in PUA lit.

He also hides how to deal with AMOG Competition here.

The plan is to spike the girl’s emotions, get her reactive to me, and then get the guy jumping through a couple of my hoops.

I won’t go into the rest of the story, but it’s pretty epic along with some commentary on what most guys would try, and what you should do instead.

I’m gonna end it here.  Not working tomorrow, so I should be able to rock out Part 3 – How to put his stuff into action and my overall impressions. of the book.

-Archie

Technical Game Bible Review Pt 1 of 3

Got a request to review this book.  You can check out Saul Tee at his site.  No affiliate link.  Not getting paid for this.

Also not adding my usual pictures to break up the walls of text.

Overall, I really like this book.  I think it’s a good distillation of actual pickup principles before pick up got all “woo woo”. It puts contemporary RSD  and London Day Game style into context.  It explains why they work and don’t work.  It leans back into a traditional (old school/indirect game) and talks in the language of psychology.

There are some interesting insights for veterans.  It might be a bit hard for beginners – but it’s the right information. There are easier things to read, and lots of dumb videos to watch – but this is book

Going to review it section by section, but hopefully not give too much away.

Prologue – Why this is the last product you’ll ever need

This the standard stuff that all pick up artists trying to sell you something say.  He’s 23 and has been in the game since he was 18 – so basically he’s only been running up on checks since ~2014.

As an old man, this is not a selling point to me.  But if I was a young man, hitting on 18 year olds, this would definitely be a selling point.

He creates a fictional character Jesse, that gets “scammed” for thousands, because he went on a boot camp with a well reputed company. (Gee, I wonder who he’s talking about?)

As a piece of game aka sales copy – it’s only aight.  I would have cut this section out.  You’ve already bought the book, no need to keep selling.  This is “over-gaming”.

Inner Game Overview

He starts the chapter with how important is “inner game”…and doesn’t really answer that question in the first section.

From my perspective, the term “inner game” as used by the community – can mean anything from self esteem, self confidence, to killer instinct, to dealing with approach anxiety.  It’s a very murky term.  He defines it as self esteem.

That’s not what it has meant historically in the community, but only seduction nerds really want to get deep into the etymology and changing meaning.

Optimal State – State is the idea of being in a talkative/good mood so that you can talk to girls.  Mystery talked about loosening up your tongue, but the current idea of “state” comes from RSD.  You need to be in state in order to run their style of game.  They do emotional transference (I don’t know if that’s how they would describe it, but if you observed them like a scientist would – that’s what they are doing) – so unless you have emotions to transfer – you can’t actually do their game successfully.

Saul Tee than refutes the idea of needing state, he clarifies the “necessity of state” but also the problems of needing “state” and the problems that go with using a state based game.

And he suggests the exact opposite of being in a good/talkative/chatterbox mood.  It’s actually a really good little discussion where he brings in university research.

How to Run the Interaction from Start to Finish

Belief Systems and Mindsets – These are very important.  Another thing I agree with, and anyone with sense would also agree with.

That’s just not the case in the current community, nor has it been the case.  There are tons of PRACTICAL SKILLZ ONLY type gurus, and most of them…let’s just say they’re attitudes speaks for themselves.

He lays out his trifecta of beliefs – the 3 things you need to believe in order to have success with women.  None of them are new to the scene, but they aren’t as popular win the Tinder/Instagram era.

How to Rewire your brain with these beliefs –  Something missing from most manuals and programs.

He has this interesting sentence

Your subconscious mind cannot differentiate between reality
and imagination.

I think he’s actually on to something, but he doesn’t develop it. Nor does he connect it with something he said earlier.  There’s a bit of psychology at work in the text, but also psychology for you to use.  It’s really brilliant as an idea on how to create a deeper change in your BEHAVIOR, but it might not change your mindset.

Becoming a Natural – He dispels the myth that you can become a natural without defining what a natural is.  What everyone means when they say natural now – is not a guy that’s been a natural with women all his life – but a guy that learns how to do pick up and everything comes off naturally.  He has all the technical and inner game internalized.   Todd calls this advanced game.

He goes on to give examples of naturals in other fields – but he clearly has never met a natural.   He leans on the competence ladder chestnut.

  1. Unconscious incompetence – you don’t even know that you’re fucking up
  2. Conscious incompetence – you know you’re fucking up
  3. Conscious competence – You can do shit, but only if you concentrate
  4. Unconscious competence – You can do shit well and not even think about it.

That’s not what a natural lady killer is like.  I’ve met lots of street fighter type players – i.e. no technique, all balls.  If you have not met any, you’re not going to black clubs.

But I’ve only met a handful of real naturals in my life.

Being effective with their styles would not be possible for anyone but them. Indeed, you would probably need a high speed camera to catch all of the micro-expressions, slight shifts in body language.  Saul Tee doesn’t get into that.  Maybe he knows some, maybe he doesn’t.

This is the closest thing i’ve seen on YouTube that gets at what being a natural looks like.  In one of the videos, he talks about his childhood with his parents putting him and his siblings up on stage to perform.  The natural is created in those formative years.  The Dark Side naturals – like Iceberg Slim seeing his father getting played by his own mother – and that changed something deep inside of him.

https://youtu.be/oUcSHIzlBSM

I’m getting off track.

Just Be Yourself – He deals with this one in a familiar way.  I like to think that this is a rebuke of Mark Manson’s bullshit, but I feel like I’m the only person in the world that hates that book.

The Morality of Pickup – I know why this is here, because moralists that are failing at getting girls by “just being themselves” – think it’s morally wrong to use any sort of technique.  I am annoyed by the presence.  It’s not a particularly persuasive argument.

How to Run the Night

This chapter is less practical than it sounds. It should be renamed to “what you’re actually doing when you’re picking up a girl”.  As opposed to the image it paints in your mind.

He explains why old school methods don’t work. (I don’t think the problem is with the method…I digress) But he sets up the idea that when you meet a girl, what you’re really doing is putting the girl on a “Yes, Ladder”  (More at the link, but a good thing to google in general)

    1. What is your big ask?
      The most important first step is to determine about what your big ask is.
    2. Work backward
      Once you have identified your big ask, work backward, thinking of two to three smaller asks.
    3. Plan your first yes approach
      Your first yes might be even more important than your big ask. Plan your approach for your first yes as if it was just as important as your ultimate goal.
    4. Encourage trust
      Once your target has given you your first yes — don’t let them down!

Anyone familiar with sales knows the Yes Ladder.  I have never found meeting women and sales to be the same.  Women lie. Women have always lied more than my clients/prospects.

Lemme rephrase – women tell you what you want to hear, if they can get what they want (sometimes it’s out of the situation, so she’ll tell you her number, so you can leave her alone!)  And the real kicker – she either doesn’t think she’s lying, or if you can get her to admit it – she will say she was justified.  Etc.

What is lacking in this book is a  dedicated chapter on female behavior, but he does do get into it. [Note to self, add chapter(s) on female behavior]

I keep digressing – anyway, Saul Tee sees the pick up as one big “compliance ladder” (I prefer the term cooperation, but tomato tomato)

Before we proceed, I’d like to point out where some prominent
‘underground instructors’ tend to get it wrong. They
understand what compliance is – however – they act as if it’s a
fixed variable. The reality is far from it. Compliance is dynamic
and can be built. In fact, that’s all game is.

This is the key insight into his game.  Saul Tee his very intelligent.  That’s probably why I like this book so much.  He anticipates arguments and deals with them in the text.

The newb running with this idea without thinking – “all I need to do is get compliance” – will do the natural thing.  He’ll investigate if the girl is already compliant.  Saul deals with the problems with that “Roissy”-esque strategy quite quickly.

In the same chapter he also deals with the pesky “Looks greater than Game” thing as well.

Here’s how he demolishes the RSD style of game

…compliance is…something.. you can..build. That’s all ‘game’…is …Approaching a girl whose initial level of compliance for you is low, and increasing it over a relatively short period of time…It’s not ‘attraction’. It’s not ‘self-amusement’. It’s not ‘momentum’. It’s not ‘freedom from outcome’. It’s not ‘unplugging from validation’. All those concepts…are not ends in themselves. Rather, they are a means with the ultimate ends of building compliance.

He then goes into his understanding of Compliance, Investment, and Buying Temperature. One of the flaws of this book, a flaw in most pick up books, he does not explicitly define buying temperature before he starts using it.  There’s somewhat of a definition as the book goes on, but if you’ve never read this type of material – it’s a bit of a slog.

There’s an argument against the basic community idea of SPIKE, SPIKE, SPIKE emotions and that leads to sex.  And it’s much more in line with YaReally/traditional PUA’s concept of the “emotional roller coaster”.

In a lot of ways, this book is written as an attack of the contemporary style game.  The book gets considerably better on this point.  He goes into nuts and bolts of how the game works on the mind of the girl. And we’re only 46 pages into it.

Investment – This is one of the better sections of the book. He really gets into the nitty gritty of what it means in a real sense, and why it is necessary – which flows back into his compliance, buying temperature and investment formula

He defines investment via examples and explanation.  And then he gives a basic action plan/thought pattern/vision of what you need to get investment from the girl. – Investment creates compliance.  In recent years, I’ve only heard RSD Luke mention this, and only in passing. (though I may be wrong).

Later in this section he puts together Compliance’s correlation with buying temperature and investment.  He doesn’t really get nerdy and talk about High buying temperature and Low Investment or Low Buying Temperature and High Investment.  I think that’s a flaw in the pedagogical aspects of the book, and it will lead to errors and frustration.

So much of his actual game – the working parts of what he’s trying to do – is explained brilliantly and supported with literature from academia and business.

Phase 1 is comparable to the Phase 1 of MM/how most guys start but with multi-dimensions instead of a linear model.

Phase 2 is similar to the trust build/comfort and rapport phase, but it still incorporates his themes of compliance, BT, and investment.

What is interesting to me about the European/Non Amerian players  but when you read the European FR’s over the years (not Anglosphere guys in Europe, but actual European PUA’s) – the girls in Europe are much more revealing and emotionally honest compared to the typical party girls here.  I’m not going to get anything remotely “real” from a girl at a club unless I literally take her out of that space – where the environment can’t be used as an excuse of her personality/behavior.

Phase 3 is the bounce to end game.  What’s noteworthy is that he doesn’t rely on seeding the bounce.  His game is a lot more Pimp Like or ‘pimp tight’.  She’s so invested in him and is giving him so much compliance, that he doesn’t need to entice the girl with something at his place.  She just wants to be with him.

He gives you the formula for this. It’s surprising that he’s this young and understands human nature this well.

Opening Manifesto

He explains the important and non-importance of the opener.  Gives 6 types of openers.

Sub-communications – This is sort of the term we use, but he means it to be “Man to Woman”. Describing subcommunications this way is giving ground to RSD.  Nobody was saying Man To Woman back in the day.  Mainly because the understanding of direct and indirect had not be been fleshed out.

But he goes into sub-communications (and opposed to nonverbal communication) and “frames” a bit.

He breaks down how to sub-communicate man to woman into actionable pieces.  I do wish he had combined this with his 3 phases though.

Locking In – Brilliant explanation of what governs this.  Nobody talks about locking in any more.

The risk and rewards of the 6 types of openers – Risk can be high or low, and reward can be high or low.  If you’ve read any of Roosh’s work, Day Bang, Bang, or his last one Game – this would be a great contrast to that.

He then explains the relationship between the opener and the rest of the conversation.  I do like this section, and I feel for newbs it is one of the most important parts of the book – but as a vet, I can tell he doesn’t have much life experience because his understanding of what happens after the first words you say to someone are quite limited.

He then goes into the 6 openers, but they could easily be 600.  There’s plenty of example and explanation.  It’s a well done chapter.

Arouse a girl emotionally

Gonna get on my word-fetishist thing again, but AROUSE has sexual connotations. (like the world “proclivities” has connotations even if it can be used in other ways) That’s not the sort of arousal that he’s going for here – yet.

He brings in the old school idea of “value”. This is in light of his liberal use of SMV (c) Rollo throughout the text.

And there’s not much in the way of Red Pill understanding here.  Take that for good or for ill.  Right now it’s only people on Rollo’s blog in the field report section that have contemplated Red Pill philosophy coming from a deep bench of PUA/debauchery.

Emotional Spikes – He uses some great analogies to explain what’s happening, and then brings it to the real level.  The next part gets a little academic, but it’s a useful mental model.

Negs and Teases! – It wouldn’t be PUA if this topic weren’t touched on.

Mystery envisioned the neg as a something true you notice in a 10 that’s dismissing you out of course.  So you said something about her nice nails, and asked if they were real.  The reason you do this is to tell the girl that you’re not impressed.  This deflates her OVER INFLATED club derived ego.  But then….Style said negs were “pebbles’ and the proper response to a neg would be a laugh.  Let’s just say the intellectual history of negs is mixed.

The real use of a neg in 2019 is as an insult, not a backhanded compliment. So Saul Tee addresses that version and explains how to do a neg “properly”.  It’s actually quite extensive.

Disqualifiers – He’s really sarging to the oldies with this one.

Prizing Frames – Essentially how to be the Prize

Takeaways – Again, making the old stuff new.

And lots verbiage on Challenges, Boundaries, Self Amusement, Role Plays, Misinterpretation, Games/Gimmicks/Cold Reads/Real Compliments.

To be continued.