Technical Game Bible Review Pt 1 of 3

Got a request to review this book.  You can check out Saul Tee at his site.  No affiliate link.  Not getting paid for this.

Also not adding my usual pictures to break up the walls of text.

Overall, I really like this book.  I think it’s a good distillation of actual pickup principles before pick up got all “woo woo”. It puts contemporary RSD  and London Day Game style into context.  It explains why they work and don’t work.  It leans back into a traditional (old school/indirect game) and talks in the language of psychology.

There are some interesting insights for veterans.  It might be a bit hard for beginners – but it’s the right information. There are easier things to read, and lots of dumb videos to watch – but this is book

Going to review it section by section, but hopefully not give too much away.

Prologue – Why this is the last product you’ll ever need

This the standard stuff that all pick up artists trying to sell you something say.  He’s 23 and has been in the game since he was 18 – so basically he’s only been running up on checks since ~2014.

As an old man, this is not a selling point to me.  But if I was a young man, hitting on 18 year olds, this would definitely be a selling point.

He creates a fictional character Jesse, that gets “scammed” for thousands, because he went on a boot camp with a well reputed company. (Gee, I wonder who he’s talking about?)

As a piece of game aka sales copy – it’s only aight.  I would have cut this section out.  You’ve already bought the book, no need to keep selling.  This is “over-gaming”.

Inner Game Overview

He starts the chapter with how important is “inner game”…and doesn’t really answer that question in the first section.

From my perspective, the term “inner game” as used by the community – can mean anything from self esteem, self confidence, to killer instinct, to dealing with approach anxiety.  It’s a very murky term.  He defines it as self esteem.

That’s not what it has meant historically in the community, but only seduction nerds really want to get deep into the etymology and changing meaning.

Optimal State – State is the idea of being in a talkative/good mood so that you can talk to girls.  Mystery talked about loosening up your tongue, but the current idea of “state” comes from RSD.  You need to be in state in order to run their style of game.  They do emotional transference (I don’t know if that’s how they would describe it, but if you observed them like a scientist would – that’s what they are doing) – so unless you have emotions to transfer – you can’t actually do their game successfully.

Saul Tee than refutes the idea of needing state, he clarifies the “necessity of state” but also the problems of needing “state” and the problems that go with using a state based game.

And he suggests the exact opposite of being in a good/talkative/chatterbox mood.  It’s actually a really good little discussion where he brings in university research.

How to Run the Interaction from Start to Finish

Belief Systems and Mindsets – These are very important.  Another thing I agree with, and anyone with sense would also agree with.

That’s just not the case in the current community, nor has it been the case.  There are tons of PRACTICAL SKILLZ ONLY type gurus, and most of them…let’s just say they’re attitudes speaks for themselves.

He lays out his trifecta of beliefs – the 3 things you need to believe in order to have success with women.  None of them are new to the scene, but they aren’t as popular win the Tinder/Instagram era.

How to Rewire your brain with these beliefs –  Something missing from most manuals and programs.

He has this interesting sentence

Your subconscious mind cannot differentiate between reality
and imagination.

I think he’s actually on to something, but he doesn’t develop it. Nor does he connect it with something he said earlier.  There’s a bit of psychology at work in the text, but also psychology for you to use.  It’s really brilliant as an idea on how to create a deeper change in your BEHAVIOR, but it might not change your mindset.

Becoming a Natural – He dispels the myth that you can become a natural without defining what a natural is.  What everyone means when they say natural now – is not a guy that’s been a natural with women all his life – but a guy that learns how to do pick up and everything comes off naturally.  He has all the technical and inner game internalized.   Todd calls this advanced game.

He goes on to give examples of naturals in other fields – but he clearly has never met a natural.   He leans on the competence ladder chestnut.

  1. Unconscious incompetence – you don’t even know that you’re fucking up
  2. Conscious incompetence – you know you’re fucking up
  3. Conscious competence – You can do shit, but only if you concentrate
  4. Unconscious competence – You can do shit well and not even think about it.

That’s not what a natural lady killer is like.  I’ve met lots of street fighter type players – i.e. no technique, all balls.  If you have not met any, you’re not going to black clubs.

But I’ve only met a handful of real naturals in my life.

Being effective with their styles would not be possible for anyone but them. Indeed, you would probably need a high speed camera to catch all of the micro-expressions, slight shifts in body language.  Saul Tee doesn’t get into that.  Maybe he knows some, maybe he doesn’t.

This is the closest thing i’ve seen on YouTube that gets at what being a natural looks like.  In one of the videos, he talks about his childhood with his parents putting him and his siblings up on stage to perform.  The natural is created in those formative years.  The Dark Side naturals – like Iceberg Slim seeing his father getting played by his own mother – and that changed something deep inside of him.

https://youtu.be/oUcSHIzlBSM

I’m getting off track.

Just Be Yourself – He deals with this one in a familiar way.  I like to think that this is a rebuke of Mark Manson’s bullshit, but I feel like I’m the only person in the world that hates that book.

The Morality of Pickup – I know why this is here, because moralists that are failing at getting girls by “just being themselves” – think it’s morally wrong to use any sort of technique.  I am annoyed by the presence.  It’s not a particularly persuasive argument.

How to Run the Night

This chapter is less practical than it sounds. It should be renamed to “what you’re actually doing when you’re picking up a girl”.  As opposed to the image it paints in your mind.

He explains why old school methods don’t work. (I don’t think the problem is with the method…I digress) But he sets up the idea that when you meet a girl, what you’re really doing is putting the girl on a “Yes, Ladder”  (More at the link, but a good thing to google in general)

    1. What is your big ask?
      The most important first step is to determine about what your big ask is.
    2. Work backward
      Once you have identified your big ask, work backward, thinking of two to three smaller asks.
    3. Plan your first yes approach
      Your first yes might be even more important than your big ask. Plan your approach for your first yes as if it was just as important as your ultimate goal.
    4. Encourage trust
      Once your target has given you your first yes — don’t let them down!

Anyone familiar with sales knows the Yes Ladder.  I have never found meeting women and sales to be the same.  Women lie. Women have always lied more than my clients/prospects.

Lemme rephrase – women tell you what you want to hear, if they can get what they want (sometimes it’s out of the situation, so she’ll tell you her number, so you can leave her alone!)  And the real kicker – she either doesn’t think she’s lying, or if you can get her to admit it – she will say she was justified.  Etc.

What is lacking in this book is a  dedicated chapter on female behavior, but he does do get into it. [Note to self, add chapter(s) on female behavior]

I keep digressing – anyway, Saul Tee sees the pick up as one big “compliance ladder” (I prefer the term cooperation, but tomato tomato)

Before we proceed, I’d like to point out where some prominent
‘underground instructors’ tend to get it wrong. They
understand what compliance is – however – they act as if it’s a
fixed variable. The reality is far from it. Compliance is dynamic
and can be built. In fact, that’s all game is.

This is the key insight into his game.  Saul Tee his very intelligent.  That’s probably why I like this book so much.  He anticipates arguments and deals with them in the text.

The newb running with this idea without thinking – “all I need to do is get compliance” – will do the natural thing.  He’ll investigate if the girl is already compliant.  Saul deals with the problems with that “Roissy”-esque strategy quite quickly.

In the same chapter he also deals with the pesky “Looks greater than Game” thing as well.

Here’s how he demolishes the RSD style of game

…compliance is…something.. you can..build. That’s all ‘game’…is …Approaching a girl whose initial level of compliance for you is low, and increasing it over a relatively short period of time…It’s not ‘attraction’. It’s not ‘self-amusement’. It’s not ‘momentum’. It’s not ‘freedom from outcome’. It’s not ‘unplugging from validation’. All those concepts…are not ends in themselves. Rather, they are a means with the ultimate ends of building compliance.

He then goes into his understanding of Compliance, Investment, and Buying Temperature. One of the flaws of this book, a flaw in most pick up books, he does not explicitly define buying temperature before he starts using it.  There’s somewhat of a definition as the book goes on, but if you’ve never read this type of material – it’s a bit of a slog.

There’s an argument against the basic community idea of SPIKE, SPIKE, SPIKE emotions and that leads to sex.  And it’s much more in line with YaReally/traditional PUA’s concept of the “emotional roller coaster”.

In a lot of ways, this book is written as an attack of the contemporary style game.  The book gets considerably better on this point.  He goes into nuts and bolts of how the game works on the mind of the girl. And we’re only 46 pages into it.

Investment – This is one of the better sections of the book. He really gets into the nitty gritty of what it means in a real sense, and why it is necessary – which flows back into his compliance, buying temperature and investment formula

He defines investment via examples and explanation.  And then he gives a basic action plan/thought pattern/vision of what you need to get investment from the girl. – Investment creates compliance.  In recent years, I’ve only heard RSD Luke mention this, and only in passing. (though I may be wrong).

Later in this section he puts together Compliance’s correlation with buying temperature and investment.  He doesn’t really get nerdy and talk about High buying temperature and Low Investment or Low Buying Temperature and High Investment.  I think that’s a flaw in the pedagogical aspects of the book, and it will lead to errors and frustration.

So much of his actual game – the working parts of what he’s trying to do – is explained brilliantly and supported with literature from academia and business.

Phase 1 is comparable to the Phase 1 of MM/how most guys start but with multi-dimensions instead of a linear model.

Phase 2 is similar to the trust build/comfort and rapport phase, but it still incorporates his themes of compliance, BT, and investment.

What is interesting to me about the European/Non Amerian players  but when you read the European FR’s over the years (not Anglosphere guys in Europe, but actual European PUA’s) – the girls in Europe are much more revealing and emotionally honest compared to the typical party girls here.  I’m not going to get anything remotely “real” from a girl at a club unless I literally take her out of that space – where the environment can’t be used as an excuse of her personality/behavior.

Phase 3 is the bounce to end game.  What’s noteworthy is that he doesn’t rely on seeding the bounce.  His game is a lot more Pimp Like or ‘pimp tight’.  She’s so invested in him and is giving him so much compliance, that he doesn’t need to entice the girl with something at his place.  She just wants to be with him.

He gives you the formula for this. It’s surprising that he’s this young and understands human nature this well.

Opening Manifesto

He explains the important and non-importance of the opener.  Gives 6 types of openers.

Sub-communications – This is sort of the term we use, but he means it to be “Man to Woman”. Describing subcommunications this way is giving ground to RSD.  Nobody was saying Man To Woman back in the day.  Mainly because the understanding of direct and indirect had not be been fleshed out.

But he goes into sub-communications (and opposed to nonverbal communication) and “frames” a bit.

He breaks down how to sub-communicate man to woman into actionable pieces.  I do wish he had combined this with his 3 phases though.

Locking In – Brilliant explanation of what governs this.  Nobody talks about locking in any more.

The risk and rewards of the 6 types of openers – Risk can be high or low, and reward can be high or low.  If you’ve read any of Roosh’s work, Day Bang, Bang, or his last one Game – this would be a great contrast to that.

He then explains the relationship between the opener and the rest of the conversation.  I do like this section, and I feel for newbs it is one of the most important parts of the book – but as a vet, I can tell he doesn’t have much life experience because his understanding of what happens after the first words you say to someone are quite limited.

He then goes into the 6 openers, but they could easily be 600.  There’s plenty of example and explanation.  It’s a well done chapter.

Arouse a girl emotionally

Gonna get on my word-fetishist thing again, but AROUSE has sexual connotations. (like the world “proclivities” has connotations even if it can be used in other ways) That’s not the sort of arousal that he’s going for here – yet.

He brings in the old school idea of “value”. This is in light of his liberal use of SMV (c) Rollo throughout the text.

And there’s not much in the way of Red Pill understanding here.  Take that for good or for ill.  Right now it’s only people on Rollo’s blog in the field report section that have contemplated Red Pill philosophy coming from a deep bench of PUA/debauchery.

Emotional Spikes – He uses some great analogies to explain what’s happening, and then brings it to the real level.  The next part gets a little academic, but it’s a useful mental model.

Negs and Teases! – It wouldn’t be PUA if this topic weren’t touched on.

Mystery envisioned the neg as a something true you notice in a 10 that’s dismissing you out of course.  So you said something about her nice nails, and asked if they were real.  The reason you do this is to tell the girl that you’re not impressed.  This deflates her OVER INFLATED club derived ego.  But then….Style said negs were “pebbles’ and the proper response to a neg would be a laugh.  Let’s just say the intellectual history of negs is mixed.

The real use of a neg in 2019 is as an insult, not a backhanded compliment. So Saul Tee addresses that version and explains how to do a neg “properly”.  It’s actually quite extensive.

Disqualifiers – He’s really sarging to the oldies with this one.

Prizing Frames – Essentially how to be the Prize

Takeaways – Again, making the old stuff new.

And lots verbiage on Challenges, Boundaries, Self Amusement, Role Plays, Misinterpretation, Games/Gimmicks/Cold Reads/Real Compliments.

To be continued.

 

State of the Community

A Quick Intellectual History of Pick Up (for the mainstream)

  1. 50’s and before – The Good Old Days (for straight white middle class men)
  2. Turbulent 60’s and 70’s
  3. California New Age Movement
  4. Neurolinguistic Programming
  5. Ross Jeffries’s Speed Seduction (an adaptation of NLP for picking up girls)
  6. SS Newsletter online – I don’t remember if the SS was an actual news letter that came in the physical mail.  I was online at that point
  7. Alt.Seduction.Fast – Newsgroup with guys talking about pickup
  8. PUA community with lots of ideas and field testing
  9. Double Your Dating
  10. Evo-Psych becomes important – Sex At Dawn, Selfish Gene, The Red Queen, etc.
  11. Mystery Method develops – attracts following, early boot camps.
  12. SwingCat and those guys
  13. Style Releases the Game
  14. Commercial Exposure – everyone tries to cash in.
  15. Mystery goes legit
  16. Fall out with Mystery and his camp
  17. “Tyler the Villain” drops canned game and comes up with “Natural Game” (improvised emotional transfer)
  18. Lots of competing companies but RSD comes out on top by embracing YouTube.
  19. Rise of the Red Pill via Roissy/Roosh/Rollo (2 of which were in the traditional PUA camp)
  20. Jeffy and Julien incidents – and the villainous aspects of Pick Up are cemented in the mind of the Public.
  21. Rise of London Style Game (run after, be direct, be funny, zero structure), and YouTube players – largely the sons of RSD – often use the same language and concepts.
  22. Simple Pick Up Guys dumbing down game for regular dudes.
  23. 2007 – The dating apocalypse – smartphones + social media + dating sites + the financial crash – people don’t go out as much, guys don’t have as much money, they date via the internet,
  24. Roosh Goes Political with Gamer’s Gate and Return of Kings
  25. Lots of smaller PUA’s EXPOSED! Justin Wayne/JMULV/Those North Carolina Boys doing a podcast and others get taken down by mainstream.
  26. Now
    1. #Me Too and associated social trends
    2. RSD switches over to Self Development Focus and actively moving away from the “dating” space
    3. Roissy Deplatformed,
    4. Roosh and the God Pill
    5. Rollo’s version of Red Pill and Hypergamy – taken on a life of its own.  SMV as discussed on forums has gone from abstract ideas about a market, to specific advice on steroids and “looks maxing”.
    6. mASF became NextASF, the last of the OG’s from the era before Mystery Method, and that forum closed.

So this is the state of play.  The Pick Up I learned way back when is dead for the most part.

Guys that have adapted/evolved with the change from in person meets to online meets – Vinny IG Casanova over @ Swoop.  Alex of Playing with Fire.

Old School Guys that have sort of adaptedGirls Chase. Todd Valentine.

Love Tourists/Sexual Market Value ArbitrageDavid Bond

RSD Lite/Day Game/Contemporary GameTim at Viking Lifestyle; Lloyd at the Single GuyKezia Noble.

Young Guys that are doing old school structured game, though not necessarily canned game – Saul Tee and his Technical Bible and Gabriel at Surgical Pick UpNick Denton?

Euro/Canadian/Euro Gamers – mostly day game of decent looking dudes vs tourists and immigrants – Fluid SocialJames Tusk.  Valentino. Bradicus.

Ethno Gamers – Indians and Asians adapting RSD/Pick Up Lite – Let’s Get Girls.

AMS bringing in Barbershop style game with a mostly Alpha/Jock Twist.

Nice Guy Gamers – Corey Wayne, Mark Manson. Based ZeusTay Social.

Black Phillip aka Patrice O’neal (RIP) – Traditional Black Man’s Game that leans more towards the Pimp Side.

That’s where we are.

-Archie

Here’s What They Think About You b/w Questions and Answers

The user name is suspect, but I continue to find Reddit/Lesbian forums to be a gold mine of insight.

But enough red meat.

Here’s some Roo Meat

You get a lot of insight about her, but this is a painful interview.  Notice that she can’t really get a rhythm going.  A lot of these are open-ended questions, but it never plays out where she can really go indepth.

Obviously she’s performing and so is he – but the interviewer doesn’t really give her a chance to shine – so she never does.

The questions themselves are good and so are the answers – because you can go deeper.

-Archie

East Indian Archie Continued

This might be the best video Madison has ever done.  I find his infield footage to be the best in the whole RSD camp – though some of the stuff I couldn’t replicate. (one offs and unicorns).

This is an interview with a balding, older, Indian guy that cracked the code.

https://youtu.be/nhNkmhIV0vk

The videos is part interview, part lecture, and then back to the interview.

So the IRT stuff is pretty self explanatory. It’s the lecture part where Madison gets fine grained on the RSD style of game.

Back in the day, there were lots of methods

  1. Blue Pill/Regular/Square guy stuff – work out, get rich, pray
  2. Speed Seduction – adapting NLP to meeting girls
  3. Classic Indirect – Do and say things to get the girl attracted to the THING, and then she’s attracted to the maker of thing – you the PUA.
  4. Direct
  5. London Style Day Game
  6. RSD – Emotional transference game.

The law of emotional transference is simple.  What I feel, you feel, if I feel it strong enough.

Without doing the research, I have a feeling that this comes out of Tony Robbins. And the Tony Robbins stuff largely comes out of the California New Age movement which overlaps with the NLP.

So RSD sort of mashes this stealth NLP/New Age stuff together with inner game.

Inner game is bastardized version of the Inner Game of Tennis, and it actually refers more to overall self esteem as opposed to mindset during a Tennis Match and visualizing serves. Inner Game of Tennis is why my HS basketball coach had players visualize taking shots when they weren’t taking shots.  The sports psychology research bolsters “Inner Game of Tennis” concepts.

Anyway, understanding RSD game is getting that Tyler/Julien and the rest of the crew use their emotional states to resonate with girls.

The crew tends to feel a certain thing, and then tries to get the girl to feel that, then it’s a question of logistics.

Julien games himself (they all do to an extent, but J-dawg goes far with it), gets himself into a state, and then games chicks.  He puts the girl into the state he wants to her to be in.

Tyler puts the girl in the state SHE wants to be in.

A key issue here in implementing this stuff is that guys don’t know how to access their emotions.  They have emotions.  Tell a basketball guy he can’t watch the NBA Finals, and he will be upset.

But can he be upset on cue?  What about happy? What about sad?  What about interested?  What about turned on?

A big stumbling block for RSD style pick up, and Game in general – is not having access to these emotions.

I said this on podcast with RudeBwoy and Moma – you want to show emotions, not just be in a state of emotional control.  That Zen Kung Fu master bullshit, where the guy’s head is on fire, but he feels no pain – that’s not useful for pick up.  Guys are already robotic and logical.

So going with that, if you wanted to learn the emotional transfer style of game, where you basically “infect” a girl with your emotions – you have to practice accessing those emotions.

With that in mind – Madison basically lays out that in your life – work life, school life, alone time, and family life – there are a lot of emotions that you can’t access.

Like I would like to really bark on the people at work – but so far the lottery hasn’t come my way and I don’t have Fuck You Money.

So if the young player needs to check a broad cause she overstepped his bounds – he doesn’t have any emotional experience in asserting himself, dealing with conflict, or ending it.

So the video goes into using the “dark energy” – which is probably the wrong thing to say.

@24:43 – how to respond to a flake

  • How you felt
  • How you feel now that she’s flaked
  • What happens now.

If you run a boundary based game, there are consequences to her actions.

To be continued.

Don’t know the background of this artist, but the song is on the Killing Even soundtrack.

Killing Eve is what the “smart” people were watching instead of Season 8 of Game of Thrones.

Sandra Oh, (Eve) plays a member of law enforcement that has an unhealthy fascination with FEMALE serial killers.

She’s dating a sad sack of a husband who just wants to hit it from time to time.

Well she comes across her great white whale, a female serial killer named Villanelle (get it, it’s villain, but changed up a bit! – played by Jodie Comer).

But Villanelle is a lesbian.  And Eve…Eve is bi-curious.

The show itself is great, but the relationships are toxic.  And the pursuit….

There are some game lessons in the show, as it’s written by a woman – but also lots of really dark stuff.

This particular song..

Just a glance at the first verse –

I could love you just like that
And I could leave you just this fast
But you don’t judge me
‘Cause if you did, baby, I would judge you too
No, you don’t judge me
‘Cause if you did, baby, I would judge you too
‘Cause I got issues
But you got ’em too
So give ’em all to me
And I’ll give mine to you…
Perfect conversational fodder for your next bar outing.
I literally can’t read/write stuff like this and not smirk.
Anyway, the reddit sub for Killing Eve looks a whole lot like the sub for card carrying 5 star Lesbians.  The amount of shipping and stuff they’re willing to tolerate – presumably because these things are said behind closed doors…
-Archie